Architecture decisions made in a workshop are easy. The ones that hold up three years later, under real load and a live regulator, are not. We build roadmaps our clients' own teams can execute and defend.
| Country | % of population | Year |
|---|---|---|
| Morocco | 91.2% | 2024 |
| Libya | 82.0% | 2024 |
| South Africa | 78.4% | 2024 |
| Algeria | 77.4% | 2024 |
| Tunisia | 76.5% | 2024 |
| Egypt | 74.6% | 2024 |
| Ghana | 72.2% | 2024 |
| Gabon | 68.7% | 2024 |
| Djibouti | 65.3% | 2024 |
| Namibia | 64.9% | 2024 |
| Swaziland | 63.4% | 2024 |
| Equatorial Guinea | 63.3% | 2024 |
| Senegal | 60.1% | 2024 |
| Botswana | 57.5% | 2024 |
| Lesotho | 51.8% | 2024 |
| Gambia | 49.5% | 2024 |
| Republic of the Congo | 47.3% | 2024 |
| Cameroon | 46.3% | 2024 |
| Mauritania | 45.8% | 2024 |
| Zimbabwe | 41.6% | 2024 |
| Ivory Coast | 41.4% | 2024 |
| Nigeria | 41.2% | 2024 |
| Angola | 40.7% | 2024 |
| Togo | 39.5% | 2024 |
| Mali | 36.8% | 2024 |
| Kenya | 35.0% | 2024 |
| Benin | 34.0% | 2024 |
| Guinea | 33.3% | 2024 |
| Liberia | 32.2% | 2024 |
| Rwanda | 31.7% | 2024 |
| Tanzania | 31.2% | 2024 |
| Guinea Bissau | 29.8% | 2024 |
| Burkina Faso | 28.3% | 2024 |
| Somalia | 27.9% | 2024 |
| Sierra Leone | 25.1% | 2024 |
| Ethiopia | 21.9% | 2024 |
| Mozambique | 20.5% | 2024 |
| Democratic Republic of the Congo | 19.7% | 2024 |
| Malawi | 19.0% | 2024 |
| Madagascar | 18.7% | 2024 |
| Zambia | 17.1% | 2024 |
| Niger | 15.6% | 2024 |
| Central African Republic | 13.8% | 2024 |
| Chad | 12.6% | 2024 |
| Uganda | 8.9% | 2024 |
| Burundi | 8.6% | 2024 |
| South Sudan | 6.7% | 2019 |
No World Bank figure for this indicator: Eritrea, Western Sahara, Sudan, Somaliland.
Figures are the most recent available per country, which is why some years differ. Retrieved from the World Bank Open Data API.
Technology advisory work matters most exactly when the decisions are hardest to reverse: before a platform is chosen, before an architecture is committed to, before an IT operating model is set.
Independent assessment of current-state architecture against scale, resilience and regulatory requirements.
Multi-year, board-ready roadmaps that sequence investment against business priorities and risk.
Structured, defensible evaluation frameworks for major build-vs-buy and vendor decisions.
Organisation, governance and delivery model redesign so the roadmap actually gets delivered.
Independent read on current architecture, technical debt and organisational constraints, no vendor incentives in the room.
Target-state architecture and platform options, stress-tested against your actual volumes and compliance obligations.
Sequenced, budget-ready roadmap that ties every initiative to a business outcome your board will recognise.
Governance structures and internal capability so the roadmap survives beyond the engagement.
No reseller incentives or platform partnerships shape our recommendations: the advice is built around your constraints, not ours.
Roadmaps are written to survive a board conversation, not just a workshop, with the trade-offs made explicit.
Architecture recommendations are weighed against the compliance and reporting obligations you actually operate under.
Every roadmap ends in a sequenced, resourced plan your own team can run, not a deck that sits in a drive.
Bring us in before the decision is made, not after, that's where advisory earns its keep.